Oct 10, 2019

Jainism view on having a Pet...

Q9. Is it acceptable in Jainism to have a pet?
First, let’s talk about the basic tenets of Ahimsa relevant for this question. Once we understand and internalize the basic principles, we need to use our own wisdom to apply them in our current environment:
-        Ahimsa means to not hurt any living beings, including animals, through our thoughts, words and actions
-        Ahimsa means to respect all living beings and have compassion towards all living beings
-        Ahimsa means to let the living beings live in their natural habitat
-        Ahimsa means to not use animals, directly or indirectly, for our physical, emotional or any other needs
Jainism advocates following path of minimum violence for lay-people (Shravak and Shravikas), which implies using only one-sense living beings for our healthy survival and not hurting any movable two sense and higher living beings.
When it comes to having a pet, there are few basic questions: Why do you want a pet? How/where are you going to get the pet from? And other considerations like what would you feed the pet, environmental impact, companionship of same species?
Why do you want a pet?
The reasons for owning a pet can range from companionship, therapy, want to give a shelter to an animal, just because all my friends have it, it is becoming a trend now etc.
Whatever the reason might be, adopting a pet animal and bringing it inside a house restricts their freedom and deprives them of their natural habitat and companionship of its own species. Animals aren’t meant to be used by humans for their needs. Domestication of animals started only because of humans.
Buying a pet from a pet store / puppy mill
There is a lot of violence in pet breeding industries. For example, the state of Kansas is the largest puppy breeder in America. For every 1 puppy to put into market, 3-4 puppies are killed which are non-sellable.  
The pet industry also causes other kinds of violence to the animals that it sells. They separate the mothers from their litters shortly after birth, causing emotional anguish that may be out of sight to the pet owner, but very real, nonetheless. They also generally neuter or spay the animals. Even though this is done for the good intention of preventing more unwanted animals, it still causes violence and prevents them from having normal reproductive functions. As a result, if you buy animals from pet store, breeder or any commercial sources, then you are becoming a direct contributor towards such violence and this would be harmful to your spiritual growth even if you are treating that animal kindly with shelter, food, and companionship.
Rescuing a pet or using a pet as a guide/therapy/service animal
For Example, a neighbor is moving, he can’t find a home for his pet dog and he offers you to take care of it or he will put the dog to sleep. In this example, if you are willing, capable and you can take care of the pet then you are saving a pet’s life and you are having a pet out of compassion.
Another example is adoption of abandoned animal from shelter that in returns provides valuable companionship and possibly even support for an older or special needs person.
These are few such justifiable scenarios in which you may be saving a life and preventing violence.  However, you want to be mindful of directly/indirectly not promoting use of animals for human needs.
Feeding pet animals
Among the two most popular pets, dogs and cats, both are generally carnivorous. By keeping a pet, you obligate yourself to feeding the animal its preferred and natural diet. Often that will lead the owner to feed the pets non-vegetarian food, which, in turn, makes the owner complicit in supporting the entire meat industry, not just the portion eaten by the animals. This is because the meat industry uses the by-products of slaughter that are not suitable for human consumption for pet food, effectively subsidizing the cost of animal agriculture. By keeping a pet that requires non-vegetarian food, one is effectively engaging in the killing of cows, pigs, chickens, and fish to support their need for a pet.
If you decide to feed your pet vegan or vegetarian food, then it is very important to make sure your pet gets regular vet checkups to make sure they are getting the nutrients they need. For example, it is typically said that cats have to be carnivorous due to their need for taurine and arginine, which are not normally found in plant-based foods. Taurine and arginine aren’t just desirable for cats, but they are essentially because without enough taurine cats will go blind. Fortunately, Taurine and arginine can both be synthesized from vegan sources, and so these are typically found in vegan cat foods, including the brands WysongBenevo, and Ami. This is just one example but if you keep a pet, then you have to do the due diligence and research in determining their nutritional needs and alternatives.
Pets also have an adverse effect on the environment. A recent study by UCLA found that dogs and cats are responsible for 25 to 30 percent of the environmental impact of meat consumption in the United States. Furthermore, they can also carry disease, pollute waterways, and coastal zones through runoff from areas with feces, and have adverse effects on wildlife.
Companionship of its own species
Most pet animals are social / pack animals and require the company of others of their own kind. However, few pet owners are able to adopt multiple animals to keep them company. In other cases, these animals are locked up in homes like prisons for long periods of time, at the mercy of their owners to come home and interact with them. The justification that they appear happy and lead materially more comfortable lives than they could in the wild, are not valid justifications for subjugating animals for the purpose of our entertainment, companionship, or functional support. 
What is the root cause? And how can we address the root cause?
If it weren’t for humans, animals would never have been domesticated. Humans mostly started domesticating animals for their needs and now we are in this vicious circle. Just because the need keeps on increasing, puppy breeder keeps on increasing the supply. And as noted earlier for every 1 puppy to put into market, 3-4 non-sellable puppies are killed.
If these domesticated animals were sent back to their natural habitat without preparing/training them, then they wouldn’t be able to survive in the new environment either.
We cannot change all the impacts of animal domestication overnight. But at an individual level, we can stop contributing towards increasing the demand. And we can also focus on our spiritual growth so that we aren’t depending on pet for our emotional needs.
Bottom line
We strongly suggest against buying a pet animal from a pet store or commercial sources. In specific scenarios, we must use our own wisdom to do what's right at the time.
If we can help any living being in any way, then we must do so. We should never miss an opportunity to help all different forms of life around us if we have the capacity to do it.
We should also work towards growing spiritually and becoming emotionally strong, so we can eliminate our dependence of our emotional well-being on any external factors.

33 comments:

  1. Great entry. I love reading your posts. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ranjit Dugar(Dugar.ranjit@gmail.com)10/13/2019 8:29 AM

      To keep a pet is keeping a animal in captivity , may be motive is to help that animal.

      Delete
    2. So what if I am saving an animal from being put down/killed- what diet should I feed it?

      Delete
    3. I believe that it is alright to adopt a dog that is going to be out down. Also you should feed a dog a pure vegetarian diet. You can buy that kind of food from stores

      Delete
    4. very interesting points. appreciate for enlightening on the topic. While it is difficult to get an out come by following the best options advised above but one can have satisfaction of having followed the best path.

      Delete
  2. While I agree with most of these sentiments, I don't think it's possible to ignore the fact that many of the common species used as pets have already been domesticated and bred into a state where release into their historically natural habitat/environment is no longer possible. There are stark differences between the common dog now and what the were centuries ago. Even the"wild" dogs as they exist in some places are no longer independent of human interactions.
    Domesticated animals may now be dependant on humanity to care for them.

    That said, rescue, don't buy from breeders and perpetuate the market for the endless breeding of animals when so many are waiting for death in horrible environments. Vegetarian/vegan food where possible. The feeding of meat really drives home the idea of greater good... Which is worse: letting one animal die or keeping it alive and having other animals killed for its sustenance? I don't have an answer for that.

    -Written as a an owner of multiple rescue dogs (all vegan).

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is ok to have a pet as long as you feed it vegan food.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So nicely explained.. covered all the perspectives that I can think of..

    ReplyDelete
  5. Based on my understanding of Jain philosophy, using animals (another sentient soul) as property or animal products as commodity is unethical. However, since humans, though selective breading have created millions of domesticated animals to serve their selfish needs, abandoning them overnight is also cruel. As "Anonymous" argued, they can not be released in wild and expected to survive. Buying a pet only perpetuates the breading and the cycle of exploitation. Adopting a rescued pet can be an act of compassion. However, if one chooses to adopt a pet, one must make sure that the pet is neutered so that we are not perpetuating the problem of breeding human dependent species of animals and treating them as our property.
    My two cents.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanku for clarifying. From India.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The article is very informative. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  8. (1.)Domestication of animals is the beginning of Culture.
    (2.)Humans carry the culture from one generation to next another generation and New generation's legacy as far as Culture is concerned make animals violent.
    (3.)Humans are supposed to live in harmony with Nature and therefore they have unconditional love towards domesticated animals with humans following a path of moderation of their GREED with their interaction with animals, both domesticated and non-domesticated.
    (4.)To restore the confidence of humans that are victims of animal attack,other humans should stabilise victims emotionally and become in turn Responsible for any errors, if any, during interactions with domesticated and non-domesticated animals.
    At the same time humans not belonging to PET Industry should rectify their errors and ban PET Industry and encourage PET industry personnel to help ALL humans in domesticating animals with Non-violence.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Very good article with many valid points of view. Thanks. There is one more thing I want to add. I did not grow up with pets and therefore, looked upon animals as alien to my world. I guess that led to becoming fearful of animals, esp dogs. At some point, I realized I wanted to be free of my fear, I actually started praying for that, I also instinctively started apologizing within myself every time I encountered a pet in someone's house and experienced fear. I would actually say quietly, "I am sorry doggie, forgive me for giving you my fear." As luck would have it, one street doggie in our street decided to adopt me. She just would not leave our gate. Slowly, she made her way, along with her puppy, into our home and hearts. Over the years, one of them passed away, and the other one was adopted by a pet loving friend.
    The point I am making is that interaction with animals in some way is essential for nurturing compassion within us. I wish I had grown up in a pet friendly environment.
    From ancient times, cows and other animals have been part of our lives. But as the article suggests, we need to be mindful and make informed decisions so that we do not become a part of the exploitation cycle.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Eating anything which is not allowed before it is dead, is not allowed even after its death. Jains believe in BHAV, which means INTENTIONS. Your QUALITY of Intention (Subh or Asubh) to do anything, DEGREE OF LIFE etc determines the Type of Karma bandhan. There are Exceptions like : Dried Ginger, turmeric, which lose Life after getting dry, are allowed, but not all Dried Kandmud (Roots). Quantity that we consume of such Item, Intention to do so matters. What's allowed is advised by Tirthankars, as they know ALL ASPECTS OF ANY MATTER.

    ReplyDelete
  11. In Maharashrtra, India majority of farmers are Jains. For agriculture many am male are used like ox or bulls, cows, buffallows, goats, hens etc...
    In spite of modern equipments like tractors and other machines, small farmers can't afford and have to resort to use of animals for their survival and sustenance. Though all the points and views are agreed to, moderation of use is permissible. It should not be excessive, and should not be used for entertainment like running races etc. (Incidentally races are banned now.)

    ReplyDelete
  12. Is mushroom Two indriya jeeva? Or one indriya jeeva? Is it ok to eat if i am following jainisam?
    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  13. All people who consider themselves ahimsaks specially true Jains must read this entire post.

    We love our pets is the biggest myth or a lie. Pet industry has a big lobby with 70+ billion revenue. Pets are nothing but a toy for personal pleasure shockingly even a sex toy for some which is a forbidden taboo subject yet to be exposed. Pets are mass bred, puppies are separated from parents and sold like peanuts online and in stores. Most Pets are genetically modified hybrid to make their legs and other body parts short because of which they have heart, depression and mental problems, they are even made to take mental pills like humans and finally put to sleep (what a nice word). Many dogs are devocalized where their vocal sac is removed by selfish humans. They are caged 24/7 against their will in hands of humans who are the most selfish animal on planet.

    Dog eats dog —Now comes the most horrific part, when you walk around the pet food isle do you ever thinks what it is made up of. There are rumors millions of dogs which are euthanized (put to sleep - better word) their meat is also used in pet food, pet food makers may verbally deny it but will never give this in writing, they are allowed to do this. If true then dogs may be technically feeding on their parents or ancestors

    Not to forget for many dog owners dogs are a medium to create a nuisance and terror for their helpless Neighbours who are victim of 24/7 barking and constant fear. Every dog owner claims their dog don’t bite but truth is dog never bites only its owner. If every selfish human families gets 4+ dogs (legally allowed) this world would be a nightmare. And now all of a sudden everyone are getting license for service animal claiming they have PTSD, nothing but a torture for animals and other humans. The so called non profit dog rescue and shelter companies offering adoption are equally responsible for this vicious cycle to continue in order to thrive their business. Selfish Humans will never show care towards innocent herbivore creatures but will act going crazy caring for carnivore meat eating creatures. USA is only country where you are allowed to keep any animal, there is much more gruesome about pets where you can write a whole book or make a movie if someone dares to initiate

    If a jain thinks keeping dogs is ok then he might want to think if he would let his own children go through this cruel cycle starting with separation. The answer to this should be a clear NO and Jains should immediately find and go unite their pet puppy with their parents.

    ReplyDelete
  14. All of this is true. Matter of fact, dogs are domesticated for ten thousends of years. We humans created a new breed out of the wolf. But aren´t we ourselfs domesticated? If we should go back to wilderness we could not survife for more than a couple of days, except may be some who did training in survival camps or few tribes, still living in natural environment. As a child, I grew up with animals in a farming area, and enjoyed their company, but when I found out a neighbour wanted to do harm to the kid of a goat(he wanted to slaughter it), I threw myself in between and they had to carry me away to do their thing. This was traumatizing and I didn´t trust humans anymore. Most what is happening to animals from us humans is terrible, and they helped us so much for our survival: pulling the plough, transporting weights, saving lifes from people buried by avalanches and eathquakes....We really should be grateful to them and treat them well, even if we don´t need them nowadays, since we have tractors and cars for transportation, I am so glad that Jains are different.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think this gives great insight as to why anyone, especially Jains, should refrain from having pets. We often desire to have pets as ways to ease our emotional needs or to simply have a companion but we do not recognize the consequences that our pets themselves have to endure as a result of us buying or adopting a pet. For our pleasures, the pets are trained to behave a certain way and are not free to be with their families or out in the wild to do whatever they want. We restrict them to only what we wish to offer them and end up closing off a part of their life that allows them to be free with their family in the wild. Engaging in these practices, especially those that harm other living beings to give us pleasure, is something we strive to refrain from doing in Jainism. I think the only time it would be appropriate to have a pet is if we adopt the pet that is in distress to help them in any sort of way and provide them with the things they need to nourish and grow. It is one thing to have pets for our personal needs and another thing to have pets to help abandoned animals find a safer place for them to live in. Of course, we still must be careful not to misuse them for personal needs even after adopting them because we may easily become attached to the adopted pet.

    ReplyDelete
  16. One of the best written , if not THE BEST blog on this site. Kudos ! And wish , you can write /contribute to others too where it seems they deliberately like to stir emotions by taking controversial (against Gurus and scriptures) stance.

    ReplyDelete
  17. nice https://jainism-says.blogspot.com/2019/10/jainism-view-on-having-pet.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. I am not a jain , but I totally believe in jain way of nonviolence . I just don't like to hurt any living creature . I love jain principles of nonviolence .

    ReplyDelete
  19. Even if cat or dogs are fed vegetarian/ vegan food, they are carnivores by nature. As soon as cat sees a mouse, say in your backyard, it is going to jump on it. Thus, the animal is violent by nature and will continue to be so even though you are feeding them vegan food at home. Therefore, keeping such animals as pets does not support Ahimsa, non-violence which is core principle of Jainism.

    ReplyDelete
  20. How about making a donation to a pet shelter? Is that considered acceptable in Jainism? Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  21. pets are amazing. They change your life. For one whose lonely there are great kind of partner, and they are fun just in general, and if you pay attention they all are different in terms of anger too which is interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  22. जैनधर्म अहिंसा पर आधारित है। इसलिए सभी तथ्यों का विश्लेषण अहिंसा के आधार पर ही किया जाना चाहिए। उपरोक्त विवरण पढ‌कर अच्छा लगा। हमें जीवन में सूक्ष्म अहिंसा का भी ध्यान रखना चाहिए।

    ReplyDelete
  23. All the points covered very well from all perspectives

    ReplyDelete
  24. Is spaying or neutering a pup against jainism ?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great article! thanks for sharing :)

    If someone's partner is a cat lover and has gotten a rescued cat and is not willing to move the cat's diet to vegan, and they aren't contributing to it at all, not feeding, not buying, but their partner does it, would it still impact their karma?

    ReplyDelete
  26. If someones partner owns a cat, feeds and buys non-veg food for the cat, would it still affect the other person who isnt involved in terms of karma?

    ReplyDelete